Publications
How to maintain trustworthiness when doctors act as policy advocates.
– BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
(2024)
386,
e079929
(doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079929)
The effects of communicating scientific uncertainty on trust and decision making in a public health context
– Judgment and Decision Making
(2023)
17,
849
(doi: 10.1017/s1930297500008962)
Discussion of Presidential address: Statistics in times of increasing uncertainty by Sylvia Richardson
– Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society
(2022)
185,
1499
(doi: 10.1111/rssa.12970)
The effects of quality of evidence communication on perception of public health information about COVID-19: two randomised controlled trials
– PLoS ONE
(2021)
16,
e0259048
(doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259048)
Expert elicitation on the relative importance of possible SARS-CoV-2 transmission routes and the effectiveness of mitigations.
– BMJ Open
(2021)
11,
e050869
(doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050869)
Redevelopment of the Predict: Breast Cancer website and recommendations for developing interfaces to support decision-making
– Cancer Medicine
(2021)
10,
5141
(doi: 10.1002/cam4.4072)
Factors associated with deaths due to COVID-19 versus other causes: population-based cohort analysis of UK primary care data and linked national death registrations within the OpenSAFELY platform.
– Lancet Reg Health Eur
(2021)
6,
100109
(doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100109)
How well did experts and laypeople forecast the size of the COVID-19 pandemic?
– PloS one
(2021)
16,
e0250935
(doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250935)
Communicating personalized risks from COVID-19: guidelines from an empirical study.
– Royal Society open science
(2021)
8,
201721
(doi: 10.1098/rsos.201721)
The effects of quality of evidence communication on perception of public health information about COVID-19: two randomised controlled trials
(2021)
2021.04.07.21255010
(doi: 10.1101/2021.04.07.21255010)
- 1 of 43